The lockdown isn't good for the government either. It's for the good of all. All the countries too are in debt but when it comes to to life , protection of the citizens comes first regardless the economic impact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think so too. That is why governments puts such strict measures despite the detoriorating economy. After all, lack of such measure will only lead to depopulation and lack of manpower which makes the economy even pooerer.The lockdown isn't good for the government either. It's for the good of all. All the countries too are in debt but when it comes to to life , protection of the citizens comes first regardless the economic impact.
I am against another lockdown. The effects of government borrowing so much money is already showing in terms of inflation, while most people still have the same income. With the vaccine and other measures, I believe it's possible to prevent another outbreak.Considering the financial impact of governments implementing lockdowns around the world, are you for or against restrictions? And why? We certainly can't have people dying left-right and center, but at the same time, the financial pressure that this pandemic is going to put on our future generation is disgusting. Countries are already in debt indefinitely, and now COVID has forced governments to borrow more money increasing debt, and the cost of goods and services. Now, we have to consider the impact it is having on the current businesses. Some have been harmed more than others, and the ones that have been most impacted have taken loans, gone out of business, or fired some of their staff just to stay afloat.
I would be against the idea as it only delays the inevitable. Better planning is needed to prevent deaths from COVID 19. What do you think? Let us know your thoughts in the Poll Above.
I am also of this same opinion with you because I do not see the usefulness of this lockdown as most people will still be flouting all these directives so it will be more effective when the government brings about some directives whereby people will be following sunset guidelines that will limit the spread of the coronavirus.Even when we're still locked up due to covid19 restrictions, many are still flouting the guidelines, and covid19 is still spreading. To me is making no meaning cos we can't spend all our lives on lock down.
That's just it. Restricting humans to be in tje house alone can't even add anything it will be causing more harm cos they'll be flouting guidelines to take some fresh air outside. Ways should be induce to combat the spread and not locking people inside.I am also of this same opinion with you because I do not see the usefulness of this lockdown as most people will still be flouting all these directives so it will be more effective when the government brings about some directives whereby people will be following sunset guidelines that will limit the spread of the coronavirus.
As far as I am concerned the best method that will fit anybody is that the lockdown should be restricted so that people can go out but they should be rules and restrictions according to each sector of the economy so that people will minimise the spreading of the Corona virus pandemic.The government really know the best for the people of her country and I just believe that whatever the government said is what I will accept, if the government say it is necessary for us to go on another lock down then is fine.
I just hope that there will definitely not be more love than in your country as the country has really struggled to be able to be locked down for completely month. This is not possible in my country because we seem to be very stubborn.three months of lockdown has just ended in my home country, the government is trying to vaccinate 70 percent of the population and I guess there will be no more lockdown.