Pensioners vs employees

[ansahweh]

Both are important equally, pensioners have dedicated their lifetime in service and were very faithful in carrying out their duties during their time in service. Employees on the other hand are currently serving. So both need to be treated nicely

 

[Sake]

It should be both of them, it would be a shame to not give the pension to the former employees who works hard for years and the government should interfere with private companies giving pension to ensure that they will really give it continuously. Employees should of course get paid and be given all the benefits they deserve.

 

[Felixko]

Pensioners versus employees is a every complex system . pensioners are those who has once being an employees as years goes on they become tired then will now be control the government to rest usually on the 60th year where accumulation is given for them to start their lives at home, some decide to invest ,some to into businesses which they can continue to earn. But employees are those who are still on pay by even a government sector or private sector and are still not up yo the retirement year.

 

[Blue house]

Both the pensioners and employees salary are to be paid, some pensioners are too old to work and there pension money is their only means of survivor so if they are not given money they may die out of hunger likewise the employees, they may have urgent matter to attend to financially.

 

[Jobiezue]

Both the pensioners and the employees that are still working needs the money, because both have responsibilities and families to provide for, of which their pension or salary respectively might be their only source of income. Although the pension fund have been contributed already while the pensioner was still in active duty, so the pension fund is expected to be readily available, but in a rare case that the funds are not enough, then it's better to give both of them part of their pension and salary respectively so that no one will go empty handed.

I think pensioners also needs a job so he/she needs to be an employee too to be able to meet up with life and it demands. Families and well wishes, after all life is full of stress and agony we just have to keep pushing.

 

[Ausaf Ali]

Pensioner are have small benefits regardless of your health issues and your personal health issues are not serous and your health needs to be treated with the best treatment for your financial needs and your personal income. Employees are also discuss with the company's financial services and your business and your personal income will be received and your business and your personal income will be able to get you through the process of making sure that you have the opportunity.

 

[Akinwale701]

It is a general believe that folks that collects pension are our old people. But in an economic situation where management of resources need to come in and they can only pay either the employees or the pensioners for a year,who should receive these funds..
Pensioners or employees(civil servants)

Well, it is very unfortunate that despite how pensioners are supposed to be treated very well, most government do not see reason in it. Those people have done a lot of great works for government all the days of their life, they are supposed to be treated as kings and queens. But unfortunately, government don't do that.

 

[marky]

I don't actually acknowledge that it's reasonable that just one of them will be pay off. Specialists are trying to be paid and it will be chatter on the off chance that they keep working without getting their segment. While retired folks in addition save the decision to gather their month to month annuities. They secured as of now and has contributed a phenomenal game plan in the economy. In addition, their annuity cash came from their own pocket. It was being deducted to their compensation back when they were simultaneously managing position

 

[Jobiezue]

Although pensioners sit home doing nothing while they earn unlike employees who work out their strength out their to be able able to earn either daily, weekly or monthly. But becoming an employee even as a pensioner is not really a bad idea though

 

[Hasan Raza]

Beneficiaries were previous representatives so I truly don't see the requirement for this inquiry. Abundance administrators were given those assets by retired people while they were still workers so why at that point would they offer such assets with current representatives.

 

[Eodine]

It is a general believe that folks that collects pension are our old people. But in an economic situation where management of resources need to come in and they can only pay either the employees or the pensioners for a year,who should receive these funds..
Pensioners or employees(civil servants)

Bothe the employees and pensioners should be paid. Old people need money to cater for their needs because they may not have anyone else or any other source of income and employees need money too.

 

[redpogi16]

This question is very complex, I think pensioner and employee are of the same level, but the little difference that is there is just that pensioner is already done with work where employee is still working for the company i think there should not be any kind favourism there since both deserve to be paid.

 

[HIFSA LAHORI]

Pensioner or employee both are same because they were always mentally servant. They can't do anything except job. Even a General Manager has a very big post of company but he's also a servant of company. There is very rare chance that a employee or pensioner was self-employee.

 

[Adexgrace]

If i understand these question well, its asking about employees and pensioners payment.
To start wit th two are different entirely, employees get their pay either at the end of the month or daily. While pension is given to pensioners after working for a specific period of time in an organization.

 

[MercySmith]

This post makes it look like pensioners are not suppose to be receiving what they are receiving. Pension is not charity. Pensioner have over the years of them working, deposited morning from their salary into a pension scheme. Just like issurance.

 

[Bangiszz]

Pension is an installment or asset into which an amount of cash is added during a worker's business years and from which installments are attracted to help the individual's retirement from work as intermittent installments. An annuity might be a "characterized advantage plan", where a fixed total is paid consistently to an individual, or a "characterized commitment plan", under which a fixed aggregate is contributed that at that point opens up at retirement age.Pensions ought not be mistaken for severance pay; the previous is normally paid in customary portions for life after retirement, while the last is ordinarily paid as a fixed sum after compulsory end of work before retirement.while employers are set of individuals who are dynamic and still in help who rely upon the month to month payments been paid by their separate bosses or government.

 

[Sariana23]

Bothe the employees and pensioners should be paid. Old people need money to cater for their needs because they may not have anyone else or any other source of income and employees need money too.

I totally agree with you @Eodine , both pensioners and workers deserve to receive their pay for services rendered, regardless of whether they are retirees or active workers. There should not be a situation where one is denied pay to give it to the other, as both have earned it.

 

[Mostee501]

It's actually a funny scenario, but in that kind of situation the employees are supposed to be the ones to get paid because you can't leave someone who is active in work without getting paid.

 

[Sariana23]

This question is very complex, I think pensioner and employee are of the same level, but the little difference that is there is just that pensioner is already done with work where employee is still working for the company i think there should not be any kind favourism there since both deserve to be paid.

I have read different posts, and few understood the thread very well, you are absolutely right in your post "there should not be any kind of favoritism, there since both deserve to be paid" is my way of understanding and I support your opinion, there should be no doubt who will be benefited, since both have the same right.

 

[Akinwale701]

It is a general believe that folks that collects pension are our old people. But in an economic situation where management of resources need to come in and they can only pay either the employees or the pensioners for a year,who should receive these funds..
Pensioners or employees(civil servants)

Pensioners are people who have retired from work and have been automatically enrolled in a pension schemes by the government of their country. Employees are those who are still working.